<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple Minded Regional Prejudices in a Supreme Court Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infoadvocate.org/blog/2009/04/28/simple-minded-regional-prejudices-in-a-supreme-court-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infoadvocate.org/blog/2009/04/28/simple-minded-regional-prejudices-in-a-supreme-court-opinion/</link>
	<description>Information Advocacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heh</title>
		<link>http://infoadvocate.org/blog/2009/04/28/simple-minded-regional-prejudices-in-a-supreme-court-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-6247</link>
		<dc:creator>heh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoadvocate.org/blog/?p=80#comment-6247</guid>
		<description>And he&#039;s incredibly uninformed about the broadcasting ownership structure in the country he adjudicates over, to boot....

&quot;Small town broadcasters&quot; are the least likey originators of &quot;local&quot; programming, or any programming for that matter.  Non-metropolitan-sited broadcast stations retransmit the vast majority of their content, scraping up their own local content only enough to comply with FCC local content rules (if that - check the geographic distribution of FCC enforcement actions over local content violations).  Contrary to the implication of the opinion, perhaps that&#039;s because those stations are the least likely to be locally owned.  You&#039;re more likely to see &quot;local&quot; content in Bethesda, MD than in Greenville, SC, in Seattle, WA than in Cheyenne, WY.

Catch a clue, dude...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And he&#8217;s incredibly uninformed about the broadcasting ownership structure in the country he adjudicates over, to boot&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Small town broadcasters&#8221; are the least likey originators of &#8220;local&#8221; programming, or any programming for that matter.  Non-metropolitan-sited broadcast stations retransmit the vast majority of their content, scraping up their own local content only enough to comply with FCC local content rules (if that &#8211; check the geographic distribution of FCC enforcement actions over local content violations).  Contrary to the implication of the opinion, perhaps that&#8217;s because those stations are the least likely to be locally owned.  You&#8217;re more likely to see &#8220;local&#8221; content in Bethesda, MD than in Greenville, SC, in Seattle, WA than in Cheyenne, WY.</p>
<p>Catch a clue, dude&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Rush Limbaugh as of April 28, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://infoadvocate.org/blog/2009/04/28/simple-minded-regional-prejudices-in-a-supreme-court-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Rush Limbaugh as of April 28, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoadvocate.org/blog/?p=80#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; Rush Limbaugh &#8212; Moveon.org &#8212; pro-life &#8212; pro-choice &#8212; abortion   Simple Minded Regional Prejudices in a Supreme Court Opinion - infoadvocate.org 04/29/2009 Today the Supreme Court released its opinion (pdf) in FCC v. Fox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; Rush Limbaugh &#8212; Moveon.org &#8212; pro-life &#8212; pro-choice &#8212; abortion   Simple Minded Regional Prejudices in a Supreme Court Opinion &#8211; infoadvocate.org 04/29/2009 Today the Supreme Court released its opinion (pdf) in FCC v. Fox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

