The FCC has issued two major Notices of Inquiry. One asks several questions about the Future of Media, and begins:
The objective of this review is to assess whether all Americans have access to vibrant, diverse sources of news and information that will enable them to enrich their lives, their communities and our democracy. The Future of Media project will produce a report providing a clear, precise assessment of the current media landscape, analyze policy options and, as appropriate, make policy recommendations to the FCC, other government entities, and other parties.
Another asks about “Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape“:
The evolving electronic media landscape presents parents with both tremendous opportunities and critical challenges. On the one hand, electronic media technologies present many benefits for children, such as offering an almost unlimited potential for educational avenues and providing the technological literacy needed to compete in a global economy. On the other hand, the technological developments that produce these benefits also present risks for children. With this Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”), we seek to develop a record that will help us answer the question of how to empower parents to help their children take advantage of these opportunities, while at the same time protecting children from the risks inherent in use of these platforms.
Both of these will lead to reports to the public which reflect the information the FCC has gathered.
This is apparently too much for Ken Ferree, who blogs at the Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF), concerning the first inquiry:
The problem is that the very act of initiating such an inquiry will chill protected speech; government inquiries into what is and is not working in the area of news, information, and media is itself an affront to the First Amendment. And it is no answer that the Commission has embarked on this journey with beneficent motives, it has no power to derogate from the protections of the First Amendment in the name of what one group of bureaucrats may think are important government interests.
Further, some of the PFF staff promise to “question this ‘questioning‘” that the FCC is engaging in when it asks about about “empowering parents.”
Why stop there? Maybe we should forbid the FCC and the rest of the government from watching TV, listening to the radio, going online, or reading newspapers as well.